SAS: Ruling over 1992 shooting of IRA men ‘ridiculous’ and ‘a farce’

SAS: Ruling over 1992 shooting of IRA men ‘ridiculous’ and ‘a farce’

Reuters Johnny Mercer has long gelled back hair and brown eyes. He is wearing a white collar and grey blazer. He is looking ahead. Trees are blurred in the background. Reuters
Johnny Mercer is a former MP and minister of state for veterans’ affairs

Former Veterans’ Minister Johnny Mercer believes an inquest ruling which said Special Air Service (SAS) soldiers were not justified in opening fire and killing a gang of IRA men, is “ridiculous” and “a farce”.

Kevin Barry O’Donnell, Sean O’Farrell, Peter Clancy, and Patrick Vincent died in February 1992, minutes after they had carried out a gun attack on Coalisland police station.

On Thursday, the inquest ruling was delivered in relation to the killing of the men in the ambush in Clonoe in County Tyrone.

Sinn Féin MP for Mid Ulster Cathal Mallaghan said he believed the ruling showed a “shoot to kill policy” was enacted.

The soldiers opened fire as the men arrived at St Patrick’s Church car park in a hijacked lorry which had a heavy machine gun welded to its tailgate.

Security forces had intelligence the car park would be used and 12 soldiers were in position behind a hedgerow.

Solicitors acting for their families say they are considering the verdict with regards to the possibility of prosecutions.

Family handouts A four photo montage of the four IRA men who were killed. They each have dark brown hair. Left to right: brown eyes and open mouth smile, brown eyes and closed mouth with tie on in black and white, half smile with maroon jumper on over blue shirt, wide smile with brown eyes, a white shirt and orange coat. Family handouts

An inquest has ruled the shooting of Peter Clancy, Patrick Vincent, Kevin Barry O’Donnell and Sean O’Farrell by the SAS was unjustified

Mercer, a former Conservative MP and veterans’ minister, told BBC programme Good Morning Ulster the inquest ruling made Northern Ireland and the judicial system “look ridiculous”.

“I’ve sat through some of these cases and it’s a farce. It’s really sad because it not only destroys the lives of these veterans,” he said.

“At same time it doesn’t provide any answers whatsoever to anybody.

“The process is a joke, it’s an effort to settle scores…to rewrite the history of the Troubles and it’s a hell of a lot of money for the legal participants”.

“It does nothing for truth and justice.”

Pacemaker Lorry which had a heavy machine gun welded to its tailgate. It is painted red with a white stripe across the front. The grass before it is littered with white strips and the trees are bare across a grey sky. Pacemaker

The four IRA men hijacked a lorry which had a heavy machine gun welded to its tailgate

A ‘despicable’ ambush

Mark Thompson from the campaign group Relatives for Justice told Good Morning Ulster Mercer has “made a career out of defending indefensible actions of the British Army”.

“The story is here that the UK government who was condemning the actions of the republicans and other organisations was engaging for itself in the very actions that it was condemning”, he said.

“It [the UK government] was engaging in a pre-planned, premeditated ambush and assassination with impunity and that is despicable.”

He added that it was an important day for society, the UK government, the British military and “all of these people who seek to demonise and vilify families, to reflect”.

‘Kill innocent people’

Democratic Unionist Party MP for East Londonderry Gregory Campbell said on Friday that the inquest ruling did not take account of the context in which the soldiers were deployed.

“Whenever these four terrorists went to Coalisland police station they went to kill innocent people – that was the reason for their mission and the coroner doesn’t seem to have taken account of that context,” he said.

Sinn Féin’s Mallaghan said the inquest hearing “reinforces” a shoot to kill policy was enacted by the soldiers.

“For some politicians they are in denial about the role of the state and as judgements and decisions like these are issued, we now find out the evidence that in many incidents the shoot to kill was a policy used by the state,” he said.

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top