JK Rowling posts essay about ‘signatories motivated by fear’ after Harry Potter stars she created turn on her by signing pro-trans open letter

JK Rowling posts essay about ‘signatories motivated by fear’ after Harry Potter stars she created turn on her by signing pro-trans open letter

JK Rowling has posted an essay about signatories ‘motivated by fear’ after Harry Potter stars signed a pro-trans open letter. 

The author, 59, took to social media this weekend to state that ‘nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex, or that binary sex isn’t a material fact’. 

It comes just days after the star of HBO’s Harry Potter reboot turned on Rowling in a letter standing ‘in solidarity’ with members of the LGBT+ community ‘impacted’ by the recent Supreme Court gender ruling.

Paapa Essiedu, who has been cast as Severus Snape in the upcoming series, was one of several signatories of the letter addressed to film and TV industry bodies encouraging them to support the trans community.   

The open letter follows last month’s Supreme Court ruling that in the 2010 Equality Act, the definition of the term ‘women’ relates only to biological women.

Rowling, who has been outspoken on gender issues for years, publicly supported the ruling. 

Seemingly referencing the open letter this weekend, Rowling wrote on X that ‘signatories of these sorts of letters are motivated by fear’, after 400 industry professionals including other actors from the franchise also signed. 

JK Rowling has posted a cryptic essay about signatories ‘motivated by fear’ after Harry Potter stars signed a pro-trans open letter

Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Rowling and Emma Watson at the London premiere of the film Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban in May 2004

Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Rowling and Emma Watson at the London premiere of the film Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban in May 2004

The star of HBO's Harry Potter reboot Paapa Essiedu (pictured) turned on its author JK Rowling in a letter standing 'in solidarity' with members of the LGBT+ community

The star of HBO’s Harry Potter reboot Paapa Essiedu (pictured) turned on its author JK Rowling in a letter standing ‘in solidarity’ with members of the LGBT+ community

The author added: ‘I often wonder whether the signatories of such letters have to quieten their consciences before publicly boosting a movement intent on removing women’s and girls’ rights, which bullies gay people who admit openly they don’t want opposite sex partners, and campaigns for the continued sterilisation of vulnerable and troubled kids. 

‘Do they feel any qualms at all while chanting the foundational lie of their religion: Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men?’ 

Rowling also made a cryptic reference to ‘back-stabbing colleagues ever ready to report wrongthink’, but did not confirm who she was referring to. 

At the end of her essay, she added: ‘I wonder if they ever ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether any of them will ever feel shame.’ 

Essiedu is set to star as Hogwarts teacher Snape, who was previously played by the late Alan Rickman in the film series, in a TV adaption of Rowling’s famous novels, which will reportedly start filming this summer.

The London born actor’s appointment sparked criticism from some fans while others defended him against what they called a ‘racist backlash’.

Elsewhere, critics of the Harry Potter author criticised her role as an executive producer on the show because of her views on transgender issues. HBO chiefs later defended her role, saying Rowling had a ‘right to express her personal views’.

Rowling alongside Radcliffe, Watson and Grint at the world premiere in London of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 in July 2011

Rowling alongside Radcliffe, Watson and Grint at the world premiere in London of Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 in July 2011

Katie Leung (pictured right), who played Cho Chang in the Harry Potter film series, also signed the letter

Katie Leung (pictured right), who played Cho Chang in the Harry Potter film series, also signed the letter

Oscar-winning actor Eddie Redmayne, who led the Fantastic Beasts films, is among the stars to have signed the letter

Oscar-winning actor Eddie Redmayne, who led the Fantastic Beasts films, is among the stars to have signed the letter

Oscar-winning actor Eddie Redmayne, who led the Fantastic Beasts films, Katie Leung, who played Cho Chang in the Harry Potter film series, and Ghosts actress Charlotte Ritchie, who appeared as a student in Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire, also signed the letter.

Another signatory was Bridgerton actress Bessie Carter, the daughter of Dame Imelda Staunton, who played Dolores Umbridge in the popular films, and Breeders star Daisy Haggard, who voiced the Ministry Of Magic lift in the Harry Potter films.

Other signatories of the film and TV letter include The Brutalist actor Joe Alwyn, Babygirl star Harris Dickinson, The Last Of Us actor Bella Ramsey, Happy Valley star James Norton, and Bridgerton’s Nicola Coughlan, who previously said she was ‘disgusted’ by the ruling.

This week, Harry Potter star Emma Watson broke her silence amid the row over Rowling’s views on trans politics with a post on Instagram.

The British actress, 35, who played Hermione Granger in the multi-billion-pound movie franchise, has been among those speaking out in the past in opposition to the writer’s opinions on gender.

While she did not refer to the recent judgment, her post came after more than 400 industry professionals signed the open letter. 

JK Rowling’s post in full 

‘In light of recent open letters from academia and the arts criticising the UK’s Supreme Court ruling on sex-based rights, it’s possibly worth remembering that nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex, or that binary sex isn’t a material fact. These letters do nothing but remind us of what we know only too well: that pretending to believe these things has become an elitist badge of virtue.

I often wonder whether the signatories of such letters have to quieten their consciences before publicly boosting a movement intent on removing women’s and girls’ rights, which bullies gay people who admit openly they don’t want opposite sex partners, and campaigns for the continued sterilisation of vulnerable and troubled kids. Do they feel any qualms at all while chanting the foundational lie of their religion: Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men?

I have no idea. All I know for sure is that it’s a complete waste of time telling a gender activist that their favourite slogan is self-contradictory nonsense, because the lie is the whole point. They’re not repeating it because it’s true – they know full well it’s not true – but because they believe they can make it true, sort of, if they force everyone else to agree. The foundational lie functions as both catechism and crucifix: the set form of words that obviates the tedious necessity of coming up with your own explanation of why you’re one of the Godly, and an exorcist’s weapon which will defeat demonic facts and reason, and promote the advance of righteous pseudoscience and sophistry.

Some argue that signatories of these sorts of letters are motivated by fear: fear for their careers, of course, but also fear of their co-religionists, who include angry, narcissistic men who threaten and sometimes enact violence on non-believers; back-stabbing colleagues ever ready to report wrongthink; the online shamers and doxxers and rape threateners, and, of course, the influential zealots in the upper echelons of liberal professions (though we can quibble whether they’re actually liberal at all, given the draconian authoritarianism that seems to have engulfed so many). Gender ideology could give medieval Catholicism a run for its money when it comes to punishing heretics, so isn’t it common sense to keep your head down and recite your Hail Mulvaneys?

But before we start feeling too sorry for any cowed and fearful TWAWites who’re TERFy on the sly, let’s not forget what a high proportion of them have willingly snatched up pitchforks and torches to join the inquisitional purges. Call me lacking in proper womanly sympathy, but I find the harm they’ve enabled and in some cases directly championed or funded – the hounding and shaming of vulnerable women, the forced loss of livelihoods, the unregulated medical experiment on minors – tends to dry up my tears at source.

History is littered with the debris of irrational and harmful belief systems that once seemed unassailable. As Orwell said, ‘Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.’ Gender ideology may have embedded itself deeply into our institutions, where it’s been imposed, top-down, on the supposedly unenlightened, but it is not invulnerable.

Court losses are starting to stack up. The condescension, overreach, entitlement and aggression of gender activists is eroding public support daily. Women are fighting back and winning significant victories. Sporting bodies have miraculously awoken from their slumber and remembered that males tend to be larger, stronger and faster than females. Parts of the medical establishment are questioning cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls is really the best way to fix their mental health problems.

One seemingly harmless little white lie – Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men – uttered in most cases without any real thought at all, and a few short years later, people who think of themselves as supremely virtuous are typing ‘yes, rapists’ pronouns are absolutely the hill I’ll die on,’ rubbing shoulders with those who call for women to be hanged and decapitated for wanting all-female rape crisis centres, and furiously denying clear and mounting evidence of the greatest medical scandal in a century.

I wonder if they ever ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether any of them will ever feel shame.’

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top